Factory workers in Chicago want back pay . . .? - chicago workers compensation lawyer
You all know the history of workers 'unnecessary' factory in Chicago and sat. . . and it seems that the banks will take the blame for that.
But no one deserves no blame in this situation? It seems that the company that the employer had terminated without notice, and that the debt financing that are not in the short term was extended ... Bank of America one of the few banks who do not want, that money from the Treasury, in fact, is to reject the proposal (and participation in the Treasury established program became mandatory for all major banks) for the Americans to harm from the banks, "then the money and then loans not wrong ... Even if BoA would like to participate in Treasury program, if you really expect the banks continue lending to companies with questionable merit?
This is not the last time this has happened. . . Just like assigning blame in the future. . . Who is paying for the worker is entitled to a severance charge?
As I said earlier, we will see many, many situations like this the coming years. . . How do you think should be addressed. . ?. I do not understand who is paying the workers, but I feel like I should pay something. . .
Sunday, January 17, 2010
Chicago Workers Compensation Lawyer Factory Workers In Chicago Want Back Pay . . .?
4 comments:
They had a short-term loans and did not know that was his due? So marked a renewal? Sounds like the problem of society to me.
Bank of America acquired $ 25 billion.
You do not like other banks, what they have to do with their money for the ransom, it is still extend loans. So, yes, they are to blame. Nowhere is there are no signs that the credit company had questionable value. "
When I hire someone, and part of the deal is that to leave when they receive a certain sum of money, then I will do, when to leave them. If they fail to keep the money on the east side, then ..... I am responsible, it seems that the managers do not responsible for the mismanagement. If I pay someone to help him find a job, but not much money, so I wondered if, instead of changing its normal charge me $ 100 $ 50, but it was the other 50 more Late ... Well, if they worked okay for me to go to my new job start and buy clothes and tools for my work and if I only lost my job, no money saved, I can only say the person who helped me in not to do. No, they did what they had to do, so we owe them. So I have my work clothes, my tools and maybe even sell my game room, but the person concerned is entitled to the money I told him that they have to pay.
When I hire someone, and part of the deal is that to leave when they receive a certain sum of money, then I will do, when to leave them. If they fail to keep the money on the east side, then ..... I am responsible, it seems that the managers do not responsible for the mismanagement. If I pay someone to help him find a job, but not much money, so I wondered if, instead of changing its normal charge me $ 100 $ 50, but it was the other 50 more Late ... Well, if they worked okay for me to go to my new job start and buy clothes and tools for my work and if I only lost my job, no money saved, I can only say the person who helped me in not to do. No, they did what they had to do, so we owe them. So I have my work clothes, my tools and maybe even sell my game room, but the person concerned is entitled to the money I told him that they have to pay.
Post a Comment